| 366 | 6 | 6 |
| Downloads | Citas | Reads |
In order to improve the nitrogen removal effect of the bioretention system and promote the construction of sponge cities in the loess distribution area, removal effect of nitrogen in rain runoff by the loess media-improved bioretention systems were studied. Setting five kinds of fillers including T(loess), TS(60% loess + 40% sand), TSF(42% loess + 28% sand + 30% fly ash), TSG(42% loess + 28% sand + 30% steel slag), TSC(42% loess + 28% sand + 30% red mud), physical model test of soil column in laboratory was used to study their total volume control and nitrogen removal effects on simulated rain-runoff. The results show that adding sand, steel slag and red mud can improve the total runoff control rates of the system, and TS system was the highest, and increased with the increase of operation time, up to 95.79 %; Adding sand, fly ash and red mud in loess, the removal rates of NH+_4-N were not significantly influenced, and the removal rates were high and all were above 80%; But after adding steel slag, the removal rate decreased significantly, and the average removal rate was only 41.18 %; Adding steel slag decreased the removal of NO~-3-N, the average removal rate was only 32.06 %; While adding red mud the removal rate was the highest, and the average removal rate was 91.42 %.
[1] 李坤娜,张书函,孟莹莹,等.生物滞留槽的径流污染削减特性试验研究[J].北京水务,2017(6):1-6.
[2] 唐双成,罗纨,贾忠华,等.雨水花园对不同赋存形态氮磷的去除效果及土壤中优先流的影响[J].水利学报,2015,46(8):943-950.
[3] JIANG CHUN-BO,LI JIA-KE,ZHANG BIN-HONG,et al.Design parameters and treatment efficiency of a retrofit bioretention system on runoff nitrogen removal[J].Environmental science and pollution research,2018,25(33):33298-33308.
[4] XIONG JIA-QING,ZHOU JIA-JIA,LI JIAN-QIANG,et al.Removal of nitrogen from rainwater runoff by bioretention cells filled with modified collapsible loess[J].Ecological engineering,2020,158:106065.
[5] 王方.太原市海绵城市建设的探讨[J].山西建筑,2017,43(23):131-132.
[6] 中华人民共和国住房城乡建设部.海绵城市建设技术指南[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
[7] 车伍,李俊奇.城市雨水利用技术与管理[D].北京:中国建筑工业出社,2006.
[8] 来雪慧,赵金安,李丹,等.太原市工业区不同下垫面降雨径流污染特征[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(6):97-100.
[9] 关彤军,张春会,王雯,等.石家庄市区道路径流雨水污染特征调查[J].河北科技大学学报,2017,38(6):591-599.
[10] 任兆龙,岳改慧.1961-2011年太原市降水气候特征分析[J].农业灾害研究,2012,2(S2):40-42.
[11] 中华人民共和国农业部.土壤检测第3部分:土壤pH的测定:NY/T 1121.3-2006[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2006.
[12] 中华人民共和国农业部.土壤检测第3部分:土壤机械组成的测定:NY/T 1121.3-2006[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2006.
[13] 赵立杰,张芳.钢渣资源综合利用及发展前景展望[J].材料导报,2020,34(S2):1319-1322,1333.
[14] 骆林平,单胜道,王志荣.DO浓度和pH对沼液废水短程硝化反应的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2018,46(3):56-59.
[15] 黄玲,魏鋆,何绪文.钢渣及钢渣-灰岩组合填料净化含氮污水的试验研究[J].水电能源科学,2011,29(5):37-40.
[16] 孙未.生物滞留池淹没区处理地表径流脱氮效果与微生物学机理[D].天津:天津大学,2018.
[17] 王瑶,王慧勇,安丽娟,等.黄壁庄水库水质评价及氮污染成因分析[J].水电能源科学,2020,38(4):60-63.
[18] LIANG JING,CHEN NAN,TONG SHUANG,et al.Sulfur autotrophic denitrification (SAD) driven by homogeneous composite particles containing CaCO3-type kitchen waste for groundwater remediation [J].Chemosphere:environmental toxicology and risk assessment,2018,212(12):954-963.
Basic Information:
DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2022.20212498
China Classification Code:X522
Citation Information:
[1]ZHAO Fan,WANG Hong-hao,LI Jing-ling ,et al.Removal Effect of Nitrogen in Rain-runoff by Loess Media Improved Bioretention System[J].Water Resources and Power,2022,40(09):74-78.DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2022.20212498.
Fund Information:
山西省自然基金项目(201901D111059); 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(51409184); 山西省青年科技研究基金项目(201601D202070)
2021-11-17
2021
2021-12-14
2021
1
2022-09-25
2022-09-25